Management Review: An International Journal
Evaluation Sheet |
Recommendations for Authors
Please answer by indicating a mark in the appropriate blank.
|
Yes |
Can be improved |
Must be improved |
Not applicable |
Does the introduction provide sufficient study motivation and study purpose? |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Is the study design appropriate? |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Are the study methods adequately described? |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Are the study results/findings clearly presented? |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Are the conclusions supported by the results/findings? |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Comments
Comments and Suggestions for Authors
|
Recommendations for Editors
|
No |
Yes |
Do you have any potential conflict of interest with this paper? |
○ |
○
|
Do you detect plagiarism? |
○ |
○ |
Do you detect inappropriate self-citations by authors? |
○ |
○ |
Do you have any other ethical concerns about this study? |
○ |
○ |
Ratings |
High |
Average |
Low |
No Answer |
* Study Originality / Novelty |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
* Significance of Study Contents |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
* Quality of Study Presentation |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
* Study Scientific Soundness |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
* Interest to the Readers |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
* Overall |
○ |
○ |
○ |
○ |
Reviewer’s information
Name:
Affiliation:
Email:
Thank you for your evaluation.
E-mail: mrij.office@gmail.com.